Labor History Map of Indianapolis

Home  |  About the Project  |  Suggest a Site!

 
Columbia Conserve Company
1735 Churchman Avenue
 

Submit your comments
about this site!

Gallery

 

Description

 

Educational Class, 1931


Workers' Council


Chicken Processing

The Columbia Conserve Company was an internationally respected experiment in workplace democracy and employee ownership that lasted from 1917 to 1943. The company canned soups and other food products from 1903 to 1953. William Powers Hapgood, president of the company, initiated three main innovations in workplace democracy in 1917:

  1. A workers’ council that made decisions on policy and operational matters (selection of supervisors, hours worked, salaries, etc.).The council handled discipline and hiring and firing decisions.Council meetings, which were open to all employees, were held weekly and included open discussions and votes.

  2. Profit sharing plan

  3. Stock purchase plan, which allowed employees to control a majority interest in the company by 1930.

Columbia employees were guaranteed an annual salary and received free health care, educational benefits, pensions, and paid vacations.  No employees were laid off during the Depression of the 1930s, though employees did vote themselves pay cuts to weather the economic hard times.

The company sought to use their unique organizational structure to bolster sales.  At one point, the following message was placed on the Columbia tomato soup label along with information on how consumers could receive a free pamphlet about the company:
"No wonder we make such fine soups, catsup, tomato juice, and other products.  We, the workers, own the business.  We are proud that we have succeeded, and succeeded because we have done better work because we cared.  Not one of us haas been dicharged on account of hard times.  For there is no unemployment.  There are 52 pay envelopes a year, old age pensions, expert care in sickness and in health, three weeks vacation with full pay.  Why should we not make good products?
"If you think this plan should spread, and if you find this product better because it is make by cooks who care, please tell your friends about it."

Strained labor relations led to a strike in 1942 that resulted in a legal battle that ended the experiment in workplace democracy.  In 1943, the trust that collectively held the company’s stock was ordered by the Marion County Superior Court to dissolve and distribute all shares to individual employees.  Columbia held on for ten more years, but, in the face of increased competition from national firms such as Campbell’s, the company was sold to John Sexton and Company of Chicago.

User Comments

   
Be the first to comment on Columbia Conserve Company
 

Resources

   

Robert Bussel, “’Business Without a Boss’: The Columbia Conserve Company and Worker’s Control, 1917-1943.” Business History Review 71, no. 3 (autumn 1997): 417-443.

Robert Bussel, From Harvard to the Ranks of Labor: Powers Hapgood and the American Working Class, (University Park, Pennsylvania, 1999). [Especially chapter 7.]

Columbia Conserve Company papers. Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.

Encyclopedia of Indianapolis, p. 460.

William P. Hapgood, The Columbia Conserve Company: An Experiment in Workers’ Ownership and Management, (Indianapolis, 1933).

Kim McQuaid, “Industry and the Co-Operative Commonwealth:William P. Hapgood and the Columbia Conserve Company.” Labor History 17, no. 4 (fall 1976), 510-529.

Russell E. Vance, Jr. “An Unsuccessful Experiment in Workers Management and Ownership: The Columbia Conserve Company.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1956.